With just five months to go before the general elections scheduled for November 30, the presidential candidate of the Libre Party, Rixi Moncada, has sparked a wave of reactions in Honduras after her harsh criticism of the Catholic Church and evangelical churches, two of the most influential institutions in the country. Her statements, which place her in open confrontation with these religious organizations, could have a high electoral cost in the context of a tense political and social landscape.
Moncada’s accusations: an offensive against the churches
In various public declarations, Moncada alleged that religious figures are simply spokespersons for the “ten oligarchic families” who, she stated, hold control over the country’s power. The presidential contender asserted that both priests and pastors are influencing their followers to advance a political agenda opposed to the present administration, which, according to her, weakens democracy and encourages social division.
This attack on churches, which have traditionally enjoyed great credibility among the Honduran population, prompted a swift response from religious leaders. The Committee of Bishops of the Catholic Church and several evangelical organizations called for a demonstration in defense of democracy and peace, warning that such statements not only deepen political division but also distance Moncada from a possible victory in the presidential elections.
Responses and alerts: the political price of opposing the churches
Political analysts have pointed out that Moncada’s words could have devastating effects on his election campaign.
Based on the perspective of Leonardo Pineda, a specialist in public sentiment, interfering with people’s beliefs is tantamount to electoral self-destruction. This is especially pertinent given that approximately 85 to 90% of the Honduran population identifies as Christian, with many still participating in church activities. Pineda highlights that in a nation where confidence in political figures is notably diminished, religious groups continue to be one of the most trusted entities for the populace.
This sector, historically important in electoral victories in Honduras, could become an insurmountable obstacle for Moncada. In this regard, various political observers have agreed that attacking the churches head-on in an election year is not only a misguided strategy, but also a high-risk move, as it alienates a large part of the electorate.
Stress on social networks and obstacles for Moncada’s election effort
The discussion has spread across social platforms and news outlets, with clips of Moncada’s remarks frequently circulating in conversations. The anger of users is evident, as numerous individuals perceive the clash with the churches as a frantic attempt by a campaign that is trying to find its path. The backlash on social platforms and in different media sources is on par with the backing from churches, who have come together to denounce what they see as a “politics of division and antagonism.”
Political marketing and public opinion experts warn that the damage Moncada has caused to her image could be irreversible. In a country where the religious base has been a fundamental pillar in the electoral successes of other parties, calls for unity by religious leaders seem to have left the candidate without allies at a critical moment.
A strategic shift or the inevitable downfall of LIBRE?
As the elections approach, a common concern is whether Moncada can adjust her approach or if her disputes with religious institutions will determine the outcome of her campaign. The harshest critics argue that it is improbable for the scenario to change, as the division caused by her remarks might have permanently distanced crucial parts of her prospective electorate.
In the end, the electoral contest in November appears to be a clash not just between political entities, but also involving the religious convictions of the Honduran populace and the tactics adopted by a party that seems to have selected a perilous route. As the influence of the churches gathers momentum against him, Moncada might have placed LIBRE in a challenging position that could turn out to be crucial during the voting process.