The presidential candidate for the LIBRE Party, Rixi Moncada, has attracted attention by creating an official Facebook page exclusively for guests of her eventual presidential inauguration. This comes at a time when experts and civil society organizations are pointing out risks to the transparency and legitimacy of the electoral process in Honduras.
Exclusive entry to safety assets
Rixi Moncada simultaneously serves as the Defense Secretary while still pursuing her presidential campaign, providing her with direct control over the Armed Forces and state security assets. Analysts suggest that this role enables her to supervise the management of electoral materials, a crucial factor in the upcoming general elections set for November 2025.
The management of these systems aligns with the forward planning of formal events connected to her prospective leadership. According to some analysts, the synchronization between her official duties and her campaign might affect how election protocols are maintained, leading to worries about fairness in ensuring the security of the electoral process.
Planning and public image
The Facebook page established by Moncada is seen by some groups as a means of privacy and safety concerning events linked to his campaign. Civic groups and transparency specialists have expressed that concentrating roles and resources under one leadership represents a challenge to public confidence in institutions and the election process’s integrity.
The phenomenon is part of a context of political polarization, where the management of the LIBRE Party faces intense scrutiny regarding the balance between citizen security and the supervision of electoral mechanisms. The attention of citizens and the media is focused on how symbolic spaces of politics, such as the presidential inauguration, are administered and how this may influence the perception of the legitimacy of the results.
Risks for institutions and public engagement
Specialists who were contacted caution that the mix of roles and the management of critical resources might result in institutional stress unless openness is assured. The connection between security measures, handling voting materials, and organizing official events underscores the necessity for external monitoring and the involvement of autonomous entities to validate the neutrality of the process.
The initial arrangements for the opening event, along with the exposure given by a digital tool like Facebook, establish a situation where people closely watch the progress of the presidential election conditions. This observation is important not only for evaluating future leadership but also for comprehending how cooperation between official roles and political campaigns might influence trust in the outcomes.