The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) is experiencing one of its most sensitive internal crises concerning the handling of the so-called “Salazar case.” This scandal involves allegations of sexual harassment and abuse of power linked to former Moncloa adviser Paco Salazar and his associate, Antonio Hernández. Both individuals, until recently, were integral members of the Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s inner circle, who is presently encircled by multiple corruption cases.
Who is Paco Salazar and what is he accused of
Francisco José “Paco” Salazar, a veteran member of the PSOE from Seville, served as the mayor of Montellano and subsequently became a member of the Spanish Congress. He also held key positions with Pedro Sánchez at the party’s headquarters in Ferraz and at the Moncloa Palace.
In recent months, numerous female Socialist members and staff who were employed under his supervision have internally reported behaviors they characterize as sexual harassment and abuse of power: comments with sexual undertones, relentless invitations to private meetings beyond working hours, and proposals to let them stay at his residence, consistently within a framework of hierarchical dependence.
As a consequence of these grievances, Salazar was relieved of his duties within the party and no longer holds a role in the federal executive, in addition to losing his influential position in Moncloa. The incidents are under investigation following the PSOE’s internal anti-harassment procedures and might result in legal proceedings should the complainants choose to advance, yet for now, there is quiet.
The position held by Antonio Hernández, the ousted confidant
Antonio Hernández, until now director of the Political Coordination Department in Moncloa and a key figure in the Government’s political machinery, was considered Salazar’s right-hand man and his main support in day-to-day matters.
The women who accused Salazar additionally identified Hernández as a supposed “accomplice” and “cover-up” of the misconduct, asserting that he was informed of the situation and did not take action to safeguard the victims, a statement he refutes.
In the middle of the scandal, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez decided to push for his dismissal both from Moncloa and from the organizational structure of the Andalusian PSOE, a decision that the Council of Ministers has formalized in recent days and which has been interpreted as an attempt to “cauterize” the crisis and cut off any appearance of connivance with the conduct attributed to Salazar.
Criticism of the PSOE’s internal handling and delayed response
Numerous press articles suggest that the PSOE required over four months to officially reach out to the victims following the initial complaints, leading to significant internal dissent and greatly tarnishing the party’s reputation. The operation of the anti-harassment committee has been scrutinized for its sluggishness, lack of coordination, and inadequate communication with the federal leadership, in a party that prides itself on its feminist stance.
At the same time, voices critical of socialism are advocating for a comprehensive overhaul of internal protocols and organizational culture, aiming to eliminate what they term as “protective environments for alleged aggressors” and to address the neglect faced by women who come forward.
The position of Pedro Sánchez’s Government
The Government’s spokesperson and Minister of Education, Pilar Alegría, has insisted that the Executive has acted with “speed and determination” once it had formal knowledge of the accusations, highlighting Salazar’s dismissal, his removal from the PSOE executive and, now, the sacking of Antonio Hernández.
Alegría has openly admitted that her recent lunch with Salazar—held when the complaints were already known—was a “mistake”, emphasizing that the debate should center on the victims rather than the political repercussions for the party.
At the same time, different reports point to a possible judicial front for the PSOE as a legal entity, based on the possibility that the courts might consider whether there was organizational responsibility in the handling of the complaints. Prosecutorial sources quoted by some media outlets mention the possibility that the party could be investigated for an alleged crime of sexual harassment as an organization, a scenario which, at this point, remains a legal hypothesis under consideration and does not imply any actual indictment.
Response from the opposition and political repercussions
The People’s Party (PP) has declared that it will leverage its Senate majority to summon Paco Salazar to testify before the committee regarding the so-called “Koldo case”, capitalizing on the public attention the former adviser has gained. From the PP, Sánchez is accused of being the president “most detrimental to women”, associating the Salazar case with other contentious incidents in the realm of equality and victim protection.
The opposition as a whole has focused on the chain of appointments, dismissals and reassignments around Salazar, as well as on the fact that two of his closest female collaborators are said to have been moved to public companies in recent years, which reinforces the narrative of a network of trust around the former adviser within the state apparatus.
A case that challenges the party’s protocols and credibility
The Salazar case, which now includes Antonio Hernández, has created a significant political and ethical divide within Pedro Sánchez’s PSOE, amidst a societal call for zero tolerance against sexual harassment and abuses of power in both the workplace and political spheres.
While internal proceedings and potential legal actions are still ongoing, the party encounters a dual challenge: on one side, demonstrating that its anti-harassment protocols function efficiently and prioritize victims; on the other, restoring the confidence of its electorate and public opinion, which is observing with apprehension the series of leaks, corrections, and dismissals related to the case.
In any case, both Paco Salazar and Antonio Hernández continue to hold, as of today, their right to be presumed innocent before the courts, awaiting full clarification of the facts and the potential initiation of criminal proceedings. The subsequent actions taken by the PSOE and Pedro Sánchez’s Government will be crucial in defining the political, institutional, and judicial reach of this scandal. However, for now, despite the legal obligation to do so, there has been no sign that the PSOE itself is lodging any complaint with the authorities, as has already occurred with other corruption scandals involving the party.