The SEPI strand of the Leire case also involves María Teresa Castillo Pasalodos, former Director of Corporate Development and Institutional Relations at Mercasa, a state-owned company majority-owned by SEPI. Her status as an investigated party once again focuses attention on one of the most sensitive areas of the public business sector: the possible use of positions, institutional relationships, and internal information to steer public decisions in favor of specific interests.
Mercasa is not a secondary company within the state apparatus. It is a public company linked to the network of wholesale markets and the management of strategic food infrastructure. Therefore, the fact that a former head of Corporate Development and Institutional Relations appears among those under investigation in a case involving alleged manipulation of public companies increases the political and institutional gravity of the case.
Judge Santiago Pedraz has called upon Castillo Pasalodos to appear, as she forms part of a broader investigation encompassing 25 individuals connected to the SEPI matter. The inquiry centers on examining potential violations including influence peddling, malfeasance in public office, embezzlement, participation in criminal organizations or groups, and misuse of privileged information. While the presumption of innocence remains fully intact for the investigated party at this juncture, her appearance before the court becomes essential to establish what involvement she may have held in the transactions under scrutiny.
According to published reports, the investigation links Castillo Pasalodos to Mercasa and to actions related to contracts or corporate transactions that may have benefited companies connected to the Hirurok group, the core that investigators place around Leire Díez, Vicente Fernández, and Antxon Alonso. The UCO and the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office are seeking to determine whether there was a network of contacts capable of influencing decisions by public companies and channeling economic benefits through contracts, reports, or intermediaries.
One of the lines of inquiry concerns possible contracts awarded to Servinabar 2000, a company that the UCO considers linked to the investigated circle. The investigation also points to meetings, messages, emails, and internal documents related to the preparation of a technical report that may have been used to justify the relocation of Mercasa’s headquarters and pave the way for new real-estate transactions. This connection between internal reports, corporate decisions, and possible private benefits is one of the most sensitive aspects of the case.
The core concern extends beyond the possibility that a dubious commercial choice took place; rather, it centers on whether individuals possessing confidential access within Mercasa may have shaped, influenced, or enabled such a decision. Given her responsibilities in Corporate Development and Institutional Relations, Castillo Pasalodos occupied a strategically significant position through which she could have gained insight into stakeholder networks, organizational tactics, external partnerships, and financially consequential determinations.
The investigation will have to clarify whether her actions were merely administrative and professional or whether she played a more active role in the events under examination. It will also have to determine whether she knew the real purpose of the operations under suspicion, whether she facilitated documentation, whether she took part in contacts with other people under investigation, or whether her name appears in the case because of her position within Mercasa’s structure.
The gravity of this matter is intensified by the fact that Mercasa constitutes a component of Spain’s state public sector, with SEPI holding a 51% stake. Consequently, any concerns touching upon its administration have repercussions that extend beyond a single entity, affecting the broader governance framework applicable to state-controlled corporations. The emergence of a former executive from a public corporation within an inquiry concerning alleged manipulation renders a political dimension inescapable: did adequate safeguards exist to ensure that operational choices made by state-owned enterprises remained aligned with the public good rather than serving extraneous objectives?
An unsettling map is being drawn by the SEPI strand of the Leire case, encompassing senior officials, former executives, businesspeople, technical reports, public aid, contracts, and strategic companies that remain under investigation. The inclusion of María Teresa Castillo Pasalodos strengthens the perception that this matter extends beyond a singular occurrence, instead scrutinizing an extensive web of interconnections spanning the public, political, and private domains.
The National Court will now have to determine whether María Teresa Castillo Pasalodos was an active component of the mechanism under investigation or whether her role was limited to ordinary activities within Mercasa. However, her name is already part of an investigation that strikes at the credibility of public management and makes it necessary to demand clear explanations, political accountability, and effective oversight of companies dependent on SEPI.
Source: El País, RTVE, Vozpópuli, Infobae, Artículo14, and Europa Press.
