Honduras: Armed forces in controversy, lawyer Barrientos analyzes reform

In Honduras, discussions about the involvement of the military in elections have become significant after various incidents sparked debate and skepticism. An internal review by the National Electoral Council (CNE) criticized the armed forces for operational shortcomings during the primary elections, and selective disarmament of officers has led to doubts concerning the impartiality of the military.

In this context, legal and constitutional specialist Julio César Barrientos has advocated for constitutional amendments to remove the Armed Forces from any electoral roles, stating that their involvement undermines the integrity and impartiality of the process.

Discussion on CNE’s assessment and inquiries regarding military involvement in elections

The CNE audit report revealed significant deficiencies in the Armed Forces’ compliance with logistical protocol during the primary elections. Unjustified route deviations, the retention of electoral transport units, the incomplete delivery of technological kits to rural areas, and a lack of communication between military commanders and electoral coordinators were identified. These irregularities caused delays in the opening of polling stations and raised doubts about the transparency of the process. The lack of response from the military high command and the government to these accusations has intensified mistrust.

Given these circumstances, opposition parties have called for a reassessment of the deal between the CNE and the Armed Forces, the inclusion of international monitors, and independent assessments of the results transmission system. In this scenario, attorney Barrientos has labeled the constitutional provision as “outdated, hazardous, and susceptible to manipulation” because it assigns the Armed Forces the duty of safeguarding ballot boxes, distributing electoral materials, and offering logistical backing to the CNE. Barrientos contends that involving the military in civic activities undermines institutional impartiality and creates opportunities for political influence and deception.

Suggested change to the constitution and dissatisfaction in the military

Barrientos suggests a change to the constitution that would assign electoral responsibilities to a Technical Electoral Directorate connected to the CNE, staffed with civilian experts, specialized education, and complete openness. This proposal aims to update and protect election processes from military influence. Barrientos’ appeal aligns with increasing demands for elections led by civilians rather than the military.

However, the controversy is not limited to logistical failures and the proposed constitutional reform. The Joint Chiefs of Staff’s decision to selectively disarm several Armed Forces officers has raised concerns in various sectors. According to military sources and reports, the disarmament is not being applied across the board, but exclusively to officers who have expressed independent or critical positions toward the ruling party. This measure has been interpreted as an attempt at a silent purge within the military, which has generated tension and discontent among mid- and high-ranking officers.

The primary concern for opposition figures is that if the ruling party potentially loses the election, the administration might attempt to employ the military to ignore the outcomes or suppress protests. These occurrences have sparked uncertainties regarding the direction of the government and the possible influence over the military forces.